United States v. Ahumada-Real
This text of 322 F. App'x 568 (United States v. Ahumada-Real) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ramon Ahumada-Real appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ahumada-Real contends that the district court erred when it determined that his prior conviction for attempted possession or purchase for sale of cocaine, in violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11351, is a drug trafficking offense as defined by comment note (l)(B)(iv) of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. We are precluded from reaching the merits of this claim by the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ahumada-real-ca9-2009.