United States v. Ahmed Ressam

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Ahmed Ressam

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ahmed Ressam. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 F.3d 793 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2011·No. 09-30000·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee.  ORDER

Filed August 2, 2011

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-30000 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  2:99-cr-00666- AHMED RESSAM, JCC-1 Defendant-Appellee.  ORDER

Filed August 2, 2011

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

United States v. Ahmed Ressam, (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

United States v. Ahmed Ressam (United States v. Ahmed Ressam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.