United States v. Aguilar-Canche
This text of 362 F. App'x 618 (United States v. Aguilar-Canche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Lauro Aguilar-Canche appeals from the 60-month sentence and the 120-month consecutive sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for various drug offenses, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and (b)(1)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguilar-Canche contends that the district court erred by placing undue emphasis on his alleged involvement in a tobacco smuggling scheme while he was detained pretrial, and on the fact that he committed the second offense while on pretrial release for the first offense. The district court conducted a well-reasoned and balanced analysis of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable. United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aguilar-canche-ca9-2010.