United States v. Aguilar
This text of 143 F. App'x 891 (United States v. Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Michael Aguilar appeals the imposition of a 27-month sentence for pos[892]*892session of methamphetamine in violation of his supervised release, claiming that the sentence should have run concurrently with a completed 10-month sentence he has already completed for reporting violations of supervised release.
We review the application of policies laid out in the sentencing guidelines for abuse of discretion. The district court in Aguilar’s case did not abuse its discretion in following the guideline policies, and gave adequate reasons for its decision. See USSG § 7B1.3(f); United States v. Cervantes-Valenzuela, 931 F.2d 27, 29 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 F. App'x 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aguilar-ca9-2005.