United States v. Aguilar-Barragan
This text of 272 F. App'x 598 (United States v. Aguilar-Barragan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Aguilar-Barragan appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguilar-Barragan contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that his sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
Aguilar-Barragan also contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level Guideline enhancement after finding him removed subsequent to a prior felony conviction. We conclude that any error was harmless. See United States v. Zepeda-Martinez, 470 F.3d 909, 913-14 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 F. App'x 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aguilar-barragan-ca9-2008.