United States v. Aguiar-Perez

76 M.J. 165, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 267
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided March 3, 2017·No. No. 17-0167/AR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CCA 20140715. On consideration of the petition for‘grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Gourt [166] of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY AFFIRMING APPELLANT’S CONVICTION OF SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE IV WHERE THE FINDINGS OF THE COURT-MARTIAL FAILED TO REFLECT WHICH OF SEVERAL ALLEGED OFFENSES CONSTITUTED THE OFFENSE.

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed as to Specification 1 of Charge IV. The finding of guilty as to that specification is set aside, and the specification is dismissed. The remaining findings are affirmed. The record is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals. That court may reassess the sentence based on the affirmed findings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Aguiar-Perez, 76 M.J. 165, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 267 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 165 (United States v. Aguiar-Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Staff Sergeant NOEL G. AGUIAR-PEREZ
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2017