United States v. Adrian Weems
This text of United States v. Adrian Weems (United States v. Adrian Weems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 23-3229 ___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Adrian Lamar Weems
Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________
Submitted: March 5, 2024 Filed: March 8, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
After violating the conditions of supervised release for the third time, Adrian Weems received a 22-month prison sentence. His counsel, who seeks permission to withdraw, suggests the sentence is substantively unreasonable.
We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Clark, 998 F.3d 363, 367 (8th Cir. 2021) (reviewing a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion). The record shows that the district court1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment, despite varying upward from the recommended sentencing range. See Clark, 998 F.3d at 369–70. We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Adrian Weems, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adrian-weems-ca8-2024.