United States v. Adrian Toledo-Martinez

599 F. App'x 729
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 2015
Docket14-50230
StatusUnpublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 729 (United States v. Adrian Toledo-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Adrian Toledo-Martinez, 599 F. App'x 729 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Defendant Adrian Toledo-Martinez appeals his conviction and sentence for being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and affirm.

The defendant argues that his Washington Revised Code § 69.50.401 convictions for delivery of cocaine and heroin are not categorical drug trafficking offenses. However, we recently rejected the same argument advanced by the defendant, that § 69.50.401(a) is categorically overbroad because it fails to exempt acts of “administering” drugs. See United States v. Burgos-Ortega, 111 F.3d 1047, 1052-55 (9th Cir.2015). The district court did not err when it denied the motion to dismiss the indictment and applied a 12-level increase to the base offense level pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A). 1

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) (Nov. 2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adrian-toledo-martinez-ca9-2015.