United States v. Adkins
This text of United States v. Adkins (United States v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6208
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PAUL ADKINS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-238-S, CA-94-69-4)
Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Adkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adkins, No.
CR-89-238-S; CA-94-69-4 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 1995). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Adkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adkins-ca4-1996.