United States v. Adkins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 1996·No. 96-6208·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus PAUL ADKINS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-238-S, CA-94-69-4)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Adkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adkins, No. CR-89-238-S; CA-94-69-4 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Adkins, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Adkins (United States v. Adkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related