United States v. Aderoju

E.D. Virginia

United States v. Aderoju

847 F. Supp. 2d 864, 2012 WL 851615, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28238

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia

DecidedMarch 2, 2012

DocketCriminal No. 1:06CR 51

StatusPublished

This text of 847 F. Supp. 2d 864 (United States v. Aderoju) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Aderoju, 847 F. Supp. 2d 864, 2012 WL 851615, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28238 (E.D. Va. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.

This case has recently been the subject of investigations by the Virginia State Bar and the Office of Bar Counsel for the District of Columbia. The Court having been separately interviewed by both entities, and having an opportunity to revisit the facts and the law regarding the Court’s previous ruling, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Memorandum Opinion (Dkt. # 64) and Order (Dkt. # 65), entered on August 2, 2006, is vacated and withdrawn, and shall not be cited as preeedent or authority in any future judicial action. It is further

ORDERED that this Order of withdrawal will be submitted by the Court to West Publishing Company (2006 WL 2222868 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2006)) and LEXIS/NEXIS Information Services (2006 WL 2222868, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53383 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2006)), so that it may be published thus effectuating the withdrawal of the previous Memorandum Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.

This case has recently been the subject of investigations by the Virginia State Bar and the Office of Bar Counsel for the District of Columbia. The Court having been separately interviewed by both entities, and having an opportunity to revisit the facts and the law regarding the Court’s previous ruling, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Memorandum Opinion (Dkt. # 64) and Order (Dkt. # 65), entered on August 2, 2006, is vacated and withdrawn, and shall not be cited as preeedent or authority in any future judicial action. It is further

ORDERED that this Order of withdrawal will be submitted by the Court to West Publishing Company (2006 WL 2222868 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2006)) and LEXIS/NEXIS Information Services (2006 WL 2222868, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53383 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2006)), so that it may be published thus effectuating the withdrawal of the previous Memorandum Opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 F. Supp. 2d 864, 2012 WL 851615, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aderoju-vaed-2012.