United States v. Addatte

24 F. Cas. 763, 6 Blatchf. 76, 1868 U.S. App. LEXIS 1447
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York·Decided March 14, 1868·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

I am of the opinion that the ruling at the trial was wrong, and that the witness was improperly excluded. On examining the question, I find the rule to be, that, when trials are separate, the wife may testify in favor of or against any one other than her husband, except in cases where the acquittal of one defendant works the acquittal of the rest, as in cases of conspiracy, and the like. It is not contended, in this case, that the acquittal of the prisoner would work the acquittal of the other defendant, and the wife of the latter was, therefore, a competent witness. The motion for a new trial is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Addatte, 24 F. Cas. 763, 6 Blatchf. 76, 1868 U.S. App. LEXIS 1447 (circtedny 1868).

24 F. Cas. 763 (United States v. Addatte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Albritton
294 P. 76 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Woods v. State
76 Ala. 35 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)