United States v. Adams

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Adams

536 F.2d 303

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 12, 1976·No. Nos. 73-1173 to 73-1177 and 73-1191·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case,

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case,

Judgment reversed.

United States v. Adams, 536 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

536 F.2d 303 (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related