United States v. Adams

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Adams

536 F.2d 303

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 1976

DocketNos. 73-1173 to 73-1177 and 73-1191

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 536 F.2d 303 (United States v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Adams, 536 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case,

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case,

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

536 F.2d 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adams-ca9-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack