United States v. Adams

141 F. App'x 367

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20229 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BYRON DONSHA ADAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-297-2 --------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Byron Donsha Adams appeals his sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base and possession with

intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base. Adams

argues that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because he was sentenced

under a mandatory guidelines scheme. We review for plain error.

United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005),

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-20229 -2-

petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517); United

States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir. 2005),

petition for cert.filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556).

The district court committed error that is plain by

sentencing Adams under a mandatory sentencing guidelines scheme.

Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d at 733. However, Adams fails to

carry his burden of showing that this error affected his

substantial rights. Id. at 733-34. The district court made no

comments indicating that it would have imposed a lesser sentence

in the absence of mandatory guidelines. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.