United States v. Adams

633 F. App'x 162
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2016·No. No. 15-7550·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barton Joseph Adams appeals from the district court’s September 23, 2015 order denying 16 of his motions filed in 2014. On appeal, Adams fails to explain how the district court erred in its denial decisions. Accordingly, Adams has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir.2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n. 4 (4th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Adams, 633 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2016).

633 F. App'x 162 (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wahi v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
562 F.3d 599 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)