United States v. Adams

633 F. App'x 162
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7550
StatusPublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 162 (United States v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Adams, 633 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barton Joseph Adams appeals from the district court’s September 23, 2015 order denying 16 of his motions filed in 2014. On appeal, Adams fails to explain how the district court erred in its denial decisions. Accordingly, Adams has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir.2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n. 4 (4th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wahi v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
562 F.3d 599 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adams-ca4-2016.