United States v. Adams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 337 F. App'x 336
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2009·No. 09-7052·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES JEROME ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (1:91-cr-00291-PMD-2)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Jerome Adams appeals the district court’s

orders denying his petition for a writ of audita querela and his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Adams,

No. 1:91-cr-00291-PMD-2 (D.S.C. May 26, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Adams, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Adams (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.