United States v. Adams

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 2005
Docket05-6358
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Adams (United States v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Adams, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6358

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-302; CA-04-685-1)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Adams, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy Adams appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Adams, Nos. CR-

94-302; CA-04-685-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adams-ca4-2005.