United States v. Adams

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Adams

132 F. App'x 249

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 17, 2005·No. No. 04-14412; D.C. Docket No. 97-00196-CR-BH-2·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fred W. Tiemann, appointed appellate counsel for Dewayne Antonize Adams, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal because, in his opinion, there are no issues of arguable merit on which to base the appeal. Counsel’s motion is supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s revocation of supervised release and subsequent sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Fred W. Tiemann, appointed appellate counsel for Dewayne Antonize Adams, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal because, in his opinion, there are no issues of arguable merit on which to base the appeal. Counsel’s motion is supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s revocation of supervised release and subsequent sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Adams, 132 F. App'x 249 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

132 F. App'x 249 (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related