United States v. Adamic
This text of 265 F. App'x 449 (United States v. Adamic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
James Edward Adamic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his conditions of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Adamic contends that the special condition of probation that prevents him from possessing or using a computer with any “on-line computer service” was not contemplated in his plea agreement and that the condition is excessive and unreasonable. Because this court previously concluded that Adamic’s challenge to his conditions of supervised release was foreclosed by his valid appeal waiver, Adamic’s contention is precluded under the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Scrivner, 189 F.3d 825, 827-28 (9th Cir.1999).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adamic-ca9-2008.