United States v. Adam C. Risch

108 F.3d 1382, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10340, 1997 WL 107285
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 1997
Docket96-3488
StatusUnpublished

This text of 108 F.3d 1382 (United States v. Adam C. Risch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Adam C. Risch, 108 F.3d 1382, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10340, 1997 WL 107285 (8th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

108 F.3d 1382

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Adam C. RISCH, Appellant.

No. 96-3488EM

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed March 11, 1997.
Submitted March 5, 1997.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In an earlier appeal, we affirmed Adam C. Risch's drug conviction but remanded to permit the district court to consider whether Risch's sentence should be reduced under an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Risch, 87 F.3d 240, 243-44 (8th Cir.1996). On remand, the district court sentenced Risch to the statutory minimum for an offense involving 100 or more marijuana plants. Although Risch did not raise the issue in his first appeal, Risch now challenges the number of marijuana plants attributed to him. Based on Risch's failure to raise this issue in his original appeal, we will not consider Risch's new claim. See United States v. Kress, 58 F.3d 370, 373-74 (8th Cir.1995). We overrule Risch's objection to the no-argument classification of this appeal.

We affirm Risch's sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lamont D. Kress
58 F.3d 370 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Adam C. Risch
87 F.3d 240 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F.3d 1382, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10340, 1997 WL 107285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adam-c-risch-ca8-1997.