United States v. Acquaye

452 F.3d 380
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Acquaye. Read the opinion of the Court — 452 F.3d 380
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2007·No. 04-20637·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20637 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

CARL BENNETT ACQUAYE

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-60-ALL --------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed for Carl Bennett Acquaye has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Acquaye, 452 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2007).

452 F.3d 380 (United States v. Acquaye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)