United States v. Acosta

283 F. App'x 227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Acosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 475 F.3d 677
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2008·No. 07-10270·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe Acosta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Acosta has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi *228 bilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Acosta, 283 F. App'x 227 (5th Cir. 2008).

283 F. App'x 227 (United States v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)