United States v. Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 1, 2002·No. 02-40174·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40174 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHELLE ACOSTA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-01-CR-304-1 -------------------- October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michelle Acosta appeals her guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for possessing with the intent to distribute 25

kilograms of cocaine. Acosta contends that the sentencing scheme

of 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

As Acosta concedes, her argument is foreclosed by this

court’s decision in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied., 532 U.S. 1045 (2001). She raises

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40174 -2-

the issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court review. The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Acosta, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Acosta (United States v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)