United States v. Acosta
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________
No. 95-20284 (Summary Calendar) __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HECTOR FABIO RUEDA-ACOSTA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. CR-H-94-60-14) - - - - - - - - - - February 14, 1996 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Hector Fabio Rueda-Acosta appeals his conviction for
possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute it, arguing that
a search was unlawful. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's order denying the motion to suppress, and we find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the
same reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rueda-
Acosta, No. CR-H-94-60-14 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 1994).
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Acosta (United States v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.