United States v. Acosta

509 F.2d 539
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1975
DocketNo. 73-4016
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 509 F.2d 539 (United States v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Acosta, 509 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Court adopts that part of the dissenting opinion of the panel dealing with “The Sentencing Procedure” and vacates the sentence and remands the case for further sentencing, 501 F.2d 1330.

The Court, en bane, having considered the opinion and the judgment of the panel dealing with the admissibility of the evidence seized from Acosta’s premises, is equally divided on this issue. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed by an evenly divided Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nooner
759 P.2d 945 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1988)
State v. Adkins
346 S.E.2d 762 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Benitez
395 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Campbell v. State
594 P.2d 65 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1979)
Fox v. State
569 P.2d 1335 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
509 F.2d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-acosta-ca5-1975.