United States v. Acosta
509 F.2d 539
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1975·No. No. 73-4016·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The Court adopts that part of the dissenting opinion of the panel dealing with “The Sentencing Procedure” and vacates the sentence and remands the case for further sentencing, 501 F.2d 1330.
The Court, en bane, having considered the opinion and the judgment of the panel dealing with the admissibility of the evidence seized from Acosta’s premises, is equally divided on this issue. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed by an evenly divided Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Acosta, 509 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1975).
509 F.2d 539 (United States v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Nooner
759 P.2d 945 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1988)
State v. Adkins
346 S.E.2d 762 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Benitez
395 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Campbell v. State
594 P.2d 65 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1979)
Fox v. State
569 P.2d 1335 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1977)
United States v. Pio Garcia, United States of America v. Wilfredo Antonmarchi
544 F.2d 681 (Third Circuit, 1976)