United States v. Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, A/K/A Jake Baker

48 F.3d 1220, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11244, 1995 WL 94757
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1995
Docket95-1184
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 F.3d 1220 (United States v. Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, A/K/A Jake Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, A/K/A Jake Baker, 48 F.3d 1220, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11244, 1995 WL 94757 (6th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1220
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Abraham Jacob ALKHABAZ, a/k/a Jake Baker, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-1184.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 7, 1995.

Before: KENNEDY, KRUPANSKY, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Defendant has been indicted for transmitting threatening communications in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 875(c). Defendant was ordered detained pending trial, and he appeals the detention order. The government argues that the court should affirm the district court's ruling on pretrial detention. Before the court are the briefs of the defendant and the government. The government has also filed an emergency motion asking, in essence, that the district court be directed not to release the defendant on bond in the future.

Having considered the record on appeal, we conclude that the findings of the district court that no conditions of release could assure the safety of others and of the community are not clearly erroneous. The detention order therefore is affirmed. The emergency motion of the United States is denied since the district court may always reconsider a previous order denying release on the basis of new evidence or factors that were not taken into consideration.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the detention order of February 10, 1995, is affirmed. It further is ORDERED that the government's emergency motion for an order directing that the defendant not be released on bond is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1220, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11244, 1995 WL 94757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-abraham-jacob-alkhabaz-aka-jake-ba-ca6-1995.