United States v. Abraham Goldberg, D/B/A Isle of Venice Apartments and Lisa Ann Apartments

450 F.2d 295, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7506
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 1971
Docket71-1837
StatusPublished

This text of 450 F.2d 295 (United States v. Abraham Goldberg, D/B/A Isle of Venice Apartments and Lisa Ann Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Abraham Goldberg, D/B/A Isle of Venice Apartments and Lisa Ann Apartments, 450 F.2d 295, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7506 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Goldberg allegedly refused to rent an apartment to John Edward Woullard, who is black, in violation of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. Woullard was contacted by Alexander C. Ross, an attorney and Deputy Chief of the Housing Section, Civil Rights Division, of the United States Justice Department. 1 Ross attempted to correct the alleged discriminatory housing practice by informal methods, by conference, conciliation and persuasion with all parties. When a compromise could not be reached, the United States filed this suit against Goldberg under the Act, attaeh-ing an affidavit by Ross who recited in detail his efforts to resolve the dispute. On Goldberg’s motion, the District Court ordered the affidavit stricken from the record, finding that it contained information which was privileged under 42 U.S.C. § 3610(a). Thereafter, the United States filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and a motion to vacate the order striking the Ross affidavit. The District Court denied these motions and the United States appealed. We affirm.

Section 3610(a) provides that nothing said or done in the course of informal endeavors to eliminate alleged discriminatory housing practices may be made public or used as evidence in a subsequent proceeding under the Fair Housing Act without the written consent of the persons concerned. Under the facts and circumstances before us, we hold that Ross was engaged in attempting to conciliate the dispute within the meaning of section 3610(a) and that the information contained in his affidavit was therefore privileged. The United States has conceded that without the Ross affidavit it was not entitled to a preliminary injunction.

Affirmed.

1

. The Justice Department is bound to administer' its programs and activities relating to housing and urban development in a manner to further the purposes of the Act and to cooperate with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (H.U.D.) to that same end. 42 U.S.C. § 3608(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Declaration of policy
42 U.S.C. § 3601
Administration
42 U.S.C. § 3608(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 F.2d 295, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-abraham-goldberg-dba-isle-of-venice-apartments-and-lisa-ca5-1971.