United States v. Abdi Osman

705 F. App'x 190
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 2017
Docket16-4754, 16-4756, 16-4758, 17-4274
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 705 F. App'x 190 (United States v. Abdi Osman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Abdi Osman, 705 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abdi Razaq Abshir Osman, Mohamed Abdi Jama, Abdicasiis Cabaase, and Mohamed Farah (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and life sentences for piracy, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). * We conclude that Defendants’ challenges to their convictions and life sentences are barred by the law-of-the-case doctrine because we previously considered and rejected Defendants’ arguments in United States v. Said, 798 F.3d 182, 198, 198-200 (4th Cir. 2015). See United States v. Aramony, 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir. 1999) (describing law-of-the-case doctrine and its exceptions). Accordingly, we affirm the amended judgments of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Defendants also were convicted of and sentenced for other offenses, but they do not challenge those convictions or sentences on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mohamed Jama
Fourth Circuit, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 F. App'x 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-abdi-osman-ca4-2017.