United States v. Abdelhamid Sedrati
This text of 365 F. App'x 30 (United States v. Abdelhamid Sedrati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Appellant’s brief presents a single contention: that United States v. Demaree, 459 F.3d 791 (7th Cir.2006), should be overruled. Demaree holds that a district judge must use the sentencing manual that is in force on the date of sentencing, and that doing so does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. We have been asked many *31 times to reconsider Demaree and have just as often declined. Appellant does not present a new argument, so there is no reason for this court to give this issue further consideration. Appellant has preserved his contentions for presentation to the Supreme Court. Given Demaree, appellant’s sentence is unexceptionable. The judgment therefore is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 F. App'x 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-abdelhamid-sedrati-ca7-2010.