United States v. Abarca-Parra

671 F. App'x 751
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 2, 2016·No. No. 16-10542 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Juvenal Abarca-Parra in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Abarca-Parra’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Abarca-Parra, 671 F. App'x 751 (11th Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 751 (United States v. Abarca-Parra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solis v. City of Sunnyvale
N.D. California, 2020
Gonzales v. City Of San Jose
N.D. California, 2020