United States v. Abarca-Parra

671 F. App'x 751
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2016
DocketNo. 16-10542 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 671 F. App'x 751 (United States v. Abarca-Parra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Abarca-Parra, 671 F. App'x 751 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Juvenal Abarca-Parra in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Abarca-Parra’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solis v. City of Sunnyvale
N.D. California, 2020
Gonzales v. City Of San Jose
N.D. California, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-abarca-parra-ca11-2016.