United States v. Aaron Pruett

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 9 2018

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-56858

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-01561-CAB 3:96-cr-00331-CAB-1

v. Southern District of California, San Diego

AARON SCOTT PRUETT,

Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change "In sum, even if we assume"

to "Even if we assume"; on page 3, at the end of line 5 of the concurrence, add the citation: "Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886, 897–98 (Ginsburg, J., concurring)."

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be filed.