United States v. Aaron Harris
This text of 907 F.3d 1095 (United States v. Aaron Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aaron Michael Harris pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. At sentencing, the district court concluded that Harris's 2013 second-degree domestic assault conviction in Missouri state court was a crime of violence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, and it increased Harris's recommended Guidelines range as a result. See USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). It then sentenced Harris to 46 months of imprisonment, at the bottom of the recommended Guidelines range. On appeal, Harris renews his argument that his prior conviction does not qualify as a crime of violence.
The Guidelines' force clause defines a crime of violence as any offense under federal or state law punishable by imprisonment for more than one year that "has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another." USSG § 4B1.2(a)(1). 1 The parties agree that to *1096 determine whether Harris's prior conviction meets this definition, we use a modified categorical approach, examining the elements of Harris's offense of conviction, rather than his actual conduct. See Schneider , 905 F.3d at 1089-1092. If the statutory elements of Harris's offense of conviction do not require physical force, then the conviction cannot satisfy the force clause. See id. The parties also agree that Harris was convicted under Missouri Revised Statutes section 565.073.1(2). When Harris was convicted in 2013, that section provided, "A person commits the crime of domestic assault in the second degree if the act involves a family or household member ... and he or she ... [r]ecklessly causes serious physical injury to such family or household member."
We previously explained that a statute that criminalizes reckless driving cannot satisfy the force clause, as reckless driving does not require physical force.
See
Schneider
, 905 F.3d at 1091-92 ;
United States v. Fields
,
A second clause, known as the enumerated-offenses clause, provides that "murder, voluntary manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, a forcible sex offense, robbery, arson, extortion, or the use or unlawful possession of a firearm ... or explosive material" are all crimes of violence, too. USSG § 4B1.2(a)(2). The government waived its argument that Harris's prior conviction falls within the enumerated-offenses clause, because it did not raise this argument before the district court. Regardless, the government's argument would fail.
See
United States v. Schneider
,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
907 F.3d 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aaron-harris-ca8-2018.