United States v. A. Carillo-Guzman
This text of United States v. A. Carillo-Guzman (United States v. A. Carillo-Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-3965 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Adrian Carillo-Guzman, also known * [UNPUBLISHED] as Wesley Unknown, * * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: December 15, 2000
Filed: December 20, 2000 ___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Adrian Carillo-Guzman seeks to withdraw his guilty plea to a drug conspiracy charge, arguing the district court did not inquire expressly whether he understood the Spanish translation of his change-of-plea proceeding. Given Carillo-Guzman's answers to the questions contained in his petition to plead guilty and posed at the change-of-plea hearing, as well as the availability of a Spanish interpreter before the hearing and the presence of two interpreters at the hearing, we are confidant Carillo-Guzman understood the proceeding. See United States v. Martinez-Cruz, 186 F.3d 1102, 1104-05 (8th Cir. 1999).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. A. Carillo-Guzman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-a-carillo-guzman-ca8-2000.