United States v. 505 Victor Street

Fourth Circuit

United States v. 505 Victor Street

50 F. App'x 144

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2002·No. No. 02-1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paul Franklin Cassell appeals the district court’s decree and judgment of forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Cassell’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cassell, No. CA-00-419 (M.D.N.C. July 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Paul Franklin Cassell appeals the district court’s decree and judgment of forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Cassell’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cassell, No. CA-00-419 (M.D.N.C. July 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. 505 Victor Street, 50 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 144 (United States v. 505 Victor Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related