United States v. 1995 Chevrolet
This text of United States v. 1995 Chevrolet (United States v. 1995 Chevrolet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50007 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ONE 1995 CHEVROLET, ETC., Defendant,
BEVERLY LYNN WALLACE,
Claimant-Appellant.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
RESIDENCE SITUATED AT, ETC., Defendant,
LAMPASAS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT ET AL.,
Claimants,
BEVERLY LYNN WALLACE, Claimant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC Nos. W-98-CV-107, W-98-CV-109 - - - - - - - - - -
August 26, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. No. 99-50007 -2-
PER CURIAM:*
Beverly Lynn Wallace appeals the grant of summary judgment
to the Government in this civil forfeiture case. Because Wallace
did not rebut the Government’s showing of probable cause, the
district court did not err in granting the Government’s motion
for summary judgment. See United States v. Lot 9, Block 2 of
Donnybrook Place, Harris County, Texas, 919 F.2d 994 (5th Cir.
1990). Further, because the home and truck were forfeited under
§ 881(a)(4) and (7), the source of funds for their purchase is
irrelevant. See 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4), (6), (7).
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. 1995 Chevrolet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-1995-chevrolet-ca5-1999.