United States v. 1992 Volkswagon Golf GTI
This text of 126 F. App'x 636 (United States v. 1992 Volkswagon Golf GTI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Yasmin Crooks appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to strike her pleading and entering a default judgment forfeiting property to the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crooks, No. CA-04-258-3 (E.D.Va. July 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 F. App'x 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-1992-volkswagon-golf-gti-ca4-2005.