United States v. $158,677.17 In United States Currency
This text of United States v. $158,677.17 In United States Currency (United States v. $158,677.17 In United States Currency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 NUnICitHedO SLtaAteSs AA.t tToRrnUeTy A NICH 2 District of Nevada Nevada Bar Number 13644 3 DANIEL D. HOLLINGSWORTH Assistant United States Attorney 4 Nevada Bar No. 1925 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6336 6 Daniel.Hollingsworth@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States 7
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11
12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2:12-CV-2125-JAD-VCF 2:12-CV-2126-JAD-VCF 13 Plaintiff, 2:12-CV-2127-JAD-VCF Order Granting 14 v. William Richardson’s and Harvey Vechery’s Unopposed Motion to Extend 15 $158,677.17 in United States Currency, Time to File Richardson’s Rule 12(b) $761,515.36 in United States Currency, and Motion or Answer and Vechery’s Judicial 16 $844,586.92 in United States Currency, Claim and Rule 12(b) Motion or Answer (Second Extension) 17 Defendants. ECF No. 51 18 This Motion to Extend Time is the second request. LR IA 6-1. 19 William Richardson (Richardson) and Harvey Vechery (Vechery) requested the first 20 extension to, and including, April 20, 2020, ECF No. 35. This Court granted the extension, 21 ECF No. 38. Richardson and Vechery respectfully move this Court for a Second Order 22 extending the time for Richardson to file his Rule 12(b) Motion or Answer and for Vechery 23 to file his Judicial Claim and Rule 12(b) Motion or Answer to and including June 30, 2020. 24 The parties hope the settlement can be completed before that date. The reason is the 25 government, Richardson, and Vechery have made progress in settling the civil forfeiture in 26 rem action and the criminal litigation. The next step in the settlement process is that based 27 on Richardson’s signed Stipulation and Petition for Remission and Mitigation under the 28 exclusive executive branch procedure for potential settlement only, Vechery’s signed 1 || Stipulation and Petition for Remission and Mitigation under the exclusive executive branch 2 || procedure for potential settlement only, the government will prepare documents and 3 memorandums that have five levels of review that ends with the Chief of Money 4 || Laundering Asset Recovery Section, Criminal Division, United States Department of 5 || Justice, for preapproval of the exclusive executive branch Petitions for Remission and 6 || Mitigation in the civil forfeiture case.’ 7 For the first extension of time, the government consented to the extension of time at 8 || the request of David Chesnoff, counsel for Richardson, on December 18, 2019, and 9 || consented to the extension of time at the request of Patricia Lee, counsel for Vechery, on 10 || December 23, 2019. 11 The government consented to this second extension of time as requested by Patricia 12 || Lee for Vechery and David Chesnoff for Richardson on April 14, 2020. 13 This Motion is not submitted solely for the purpose of delay or for any other 14 || improper purpose. 15 This Court should grant an extension of time to, and including, June 30, 2020. 16 Dated: April 15, 2020. 17 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH 13 United States Attorney /s/ Daniel D. Hollingsworth 19 DANIEL D. HOLLINGSWORTH Assistant United States Attorney 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 HONORABLE JENNIFER A. DORSEY 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: 4-24-2020 nunc pro tunc to 4-20-2020 25 ||! 21 U.S.C. § 853(i)(1); 18 U.S.C. 8§ 981(e)(6) and 1963(g)(1); MacInnes, 223 F. App’x at 553 %6 n.3 (explaining that the statutes and the CFR authorize the attorney general to determine whether to provide relief to victims); United States v. Carter, 742 F.3d 440, 446 (9th Cir. 2014) 27 || (explaining that “the Government may choose to assign forfeited proceeds to victims ....”); DSTI, 496 F.3d at 181-82; 28 CFR Part 9; see Government’s Response, ECF No. 373, to Harvey 28 || Vechery’s Motion to Intervene, ECF No. 361.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. $158,677.17 In United States Currency, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-15867717-in-united-states-currency-nvd-2020.