United States Tube & Iron Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

68 A. 1026, 220 Pa. 42, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 724
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 6, 1908
DocketAppeal, No. 101
StatusPublished

This text of 68 A. 1026 (United States Tube & Iron Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Tube & Iron Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 68 A. 1026, 220 Pa. 42, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 724 (Pa. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment was properly entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto for the reason that no cause of action had arisen at the time tbe writ was issued. The policy of indemnity contains a provision that no action shall lie against the company as respects any loss under it unless it shall be brought by the insured himself to reimburse him for loss actually sustained and paid by him in satisfaction of a judgment within sixty days from the date of such judgment. This action was brought two days before the satisfaction of the judgment obtained in an action against the plaintiff, and it was prematurely brought.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A. 1026, 220 Pa. 42, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-tube-iron-co-v-maryland-casualty-co-pa-1908.