United States Trust Co. v. Tuchowska

227 N.W. 539, 249 Mich. 16, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 650
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1929
DocketDocket No. 39, Calendar No. 34,552.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 N.W. 539 (United States Trust Co. v. Tuchowska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Trust Co. v. Tuchowska, 227 N.W. 539, 249 Mich. 16, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 650 (Mich. 1929).

Opinion

Fead, J.

This is an action to recover $2,000 loaned to defendant by decedent in her lifetime and for other recovery not of consequence here. Defendant pleaded payment. The trial was before the court without a jury, and plaintiff had judgment for $1,000.

■ Before any testimony was taken, defendant’s former counsel made an opening statement in which he conceded that the loan had been made, and the amount. This concession rendered harmless any error in receiving in evidence a memorandum of the loan, made by decedent, and also obliged the court to deny defendant’s motion for judgment at the close of plaintiff’s case. Defendant’s own testimony as to payment was properly rejected as within the equal knowledge of the deceased. The testimony of defendant’s wife and daughter of payment was received and formed the basis of the credit allowed by the court. The court credited the specific payments to which they testified. He properly rejected their general assertions of payment in full, as not credible under their statements of the circumstances. Defendant cannot complain of the reception of certain inadmissible testimony because no proper objection was made to its introduction. The court properly refused to make findings of fact and law as request therefor was not made until after entry of judgment. Defendant had the burden of proving payment and the verdict was not against the great weight of evidence except, possibly, as intimated by the court in ruling upon the motion for a new trial, in the respect that the allowance of credits to defendant was *19 excessive. No good grounds were shown for a new trial.

Judgment is affirmed, with, costs.

North, C. J., and Butzel, Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Potter, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taskey v. Paquette
36 N.W.2d 876 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.W. 539, 249 Mich. 16, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-trust-co-v-tuchowska-mich-1929.