United States Trust Co. v. Simon
228 A.D.2d 580, 644 N.Y.2d 633, 644 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7180
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[581] The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in setting aside the foreclosure sale based on the Referee’s misunderstanding as to his authority to accept uncertified funds as a down payment (see, Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 45 NY2d 515; Glenville & 110 Corp. v Tortora, 137 AD2d 654; Ulster Sav. Bank v Bash, 114 AD2d 500).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Plorio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Trust Co. v. Simon, 228 A.D.2d 580, 644 N.Y.2d 633, 644 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 580 (United States Trust Co. v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JP Morgan Chase, N.A. v. Rajendran
141 A.D.3d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Chase v. Rajendran
50 Misc. 3d 559 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)
Chase Home Finance LLC v. Diaz
16 Misc. 3d 415 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)