United States to the Use of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company v. Markowitz Brothers, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company
This text of 389 F.2d 387 (United States to the Use of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company v. Markowitz Brothers, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
389 F.2d 387
UNITED STATES to the Use of MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR COMPANY, Appellee,
v.
MARKOWITZ BROTHERS, INC. and Continental Casualty Company, Appellants.
No. 11498.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued December 8, 1967.
Decided January 11, 1968.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria; Oren R. Lewis, Judge.
Kahl K. Spriggs, Washington, D. C. (John F. Myers and Mark P. Friedlander, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellants.
Ernest L. Ruffner, Washington, D. C. (James R. Treese, and Jackson, Gray & Laskey, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Whether or not this Miller Act suit was timely filed turns entirely upon a question of fact. We think its resolution by the Master, accepted by the District Court, was not clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 F.2d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-to-the-use-of-minneapolis-honeywell-regulator-company-v-ca4-1968.