United States Sugar Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

671 F. App'x 822
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 23, 2016·No. No. 11-1108; Consolidated with 11-1124, 11-1134, 11-1142, 11-1145, 11-1159, 11-1165, 11-1172, 11-1174, 11-1181, 13-1086, 13-1087, 13-1091, 13-1092, 13-1096, 13-1097, 13-1098, 13-1099, 13-1100, 13-1103; No. 11-1141; Consolidated with 11-1182, 11-1207, 11-1208, 13-1105, 13-1107·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

These causes came to be heard on the petition of the Environmental Protection Agency for panel rehearing as to remedy, and the responses thereto. On consideration thereof, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of this court filed July 29, 2016 remain in effect as to No. 11-1125, et al., American Forest & Paper Association, Inc., et al. v. EPA, and the above-captioned cases, in accordance with the opinion filed July 29, 2016. It is

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the numeric MACT standards set in the Major Boilers Rule for new and existing sources in each of the eighteen subcategories be remanded without vacatur for the agency to conduct further proceedings consistent with the court’s prior opinion issued July 29, 2016, in accordance with the opinion issued here in this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Sugar Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 671 F. App'x 822 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 822 (United States Sugar Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
255 F. Supp. 3d 101 (District of Columbia, 2017)