United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson

104 So. 2d 330, 39 Ala. App. 430
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 1958·No. 6 Div. 562·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Patterson is claiming unemployment compensation benefits in respect of his unemployment during the period April 28-June 30, 1956.

Patterson worked at the Blooming Mill of Fairfield Steel Works, U. S. Steel Corporation, T. C. I. Division, and was a member of the United Steelworkers of America, CIO.

During this period the locomotive engineers — members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen — were on strike.

See United States Steel Corp. v. Baxley, Ala.App., - So.2d - and United States Steel Corp. v. Garris, ante, p. 428, 104 So.2d 327.

On authority of Usher v. Department of Industrial Relations, 261 Ala. 509, 75 So.2d 165, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson, 104 So. 2d 330, 39 Ala. App. 430 (Ala. Ct. App. 1958).

104 So. 2d 330 (United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Steel Corp. v. Patterson
104 So. 2d 331 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Phelps v. United States Steel Corporation
105 So. 2d 714 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
Speagle v. United States Steel Corporation
105 So. 2d 721 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)