United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson

Alabama Court of Appeals

United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson

104 So. 2d 330, 39 Ala. App. 430

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 25, 1958

Docket6 Div. 562

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 104 So. 2d 330 (United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States Steel Corporation v. Patterson, 104 So. 2d 330, 39 Ala. App. 430 (Ala. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Patterson is claiming unemployment compensation benefits in respect of his unemployment during the period April 28-June 30, 1956.

Patterson worked at the Blooming Mill of Fairfield Steel Works, U. S. Steel Corporation, T. C. I. Division, and was a member of the United Steelworkers of America, CIO.

During this period the locomotive engineers — members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen — were on strike.

See United States Steel Corp. v. Baxley, Ala.App., - So.2d - and United States Steel Corp. v. Garris, ante, p. 428, 104 So.2d 327.

On authority of Usher v. Department of Industrial Relations, 261 Ala. 509, 75 So.2d 165, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI