United States Steel Corp. v. United States

2013 CIT 103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States Steel Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 F. Supp. 3d 1114
United States Court of International Trade·Decided August 8, 2013·No. 09-00156·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 13-103

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

and

NUCOR CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Intervenor, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge v. Court No. 09-00156 UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

UNION STEEL, POHANG IRON & STEEL CO., LTD., POHANG COATED STEEL CO., LTD., and HYUNDAI HYSCO,

Defendant-Intervenors.

JUDGMENT

Upon the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal of Count One (Zeroing) of the Complaint in

Union Steel v. United States, Court No. 09-00130 (July 10, 2013), in accordance with the

Opinion and Order issued in this case on April 25, 2012, Slip. Op. 12-55, ECF No. 131, upon

consideration of all papers and proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Remand (July 15, 2011), ECF No. 105, be, and hereby are, affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that entries of merchandise that are the subject of this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this action.

/s/ Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: August 8, 2013 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 2013 CIT 103 (cit 2013).

2013 CIT 103 (United States Steel Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.