United States Shoe Corp. v. United States

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States Shoe Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 907 F. Supp. 408
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 1998·No. Court No. 94-11-00668·Published

Opinion

Order Re; Claims Resolution Procedure

Restani, Judge:

Having considered defendant’s and various plaintiffs’ proposals for a claim resolution plan to resolve the numerous suits filed with the court to recover unconstitutionally exacted Harbor Maintenance Taxes (HMT) the court proposes the following plan to cover HMT paid on exports.

Parties wishing to file written objections to the plan may do so by August 14,1998. Hearing on the proposed plan will begin at 11:00 a.m. on August 20,1998 at the United States Court of International Trade, New York, New York.

Table of Contents

1. Proposed Plan

2. Harbor Maintenance Tax Refund Claim Form

[738]*7383. Harbor Maintenance Tax Payment Listing and Certification

4. Model Judgment

1. Plan
I. Proposed Claim Resolution Process for HMT on Exports

Overview

In accordance with its previous determinations the court orders immediate refund to be made for claims accrued within two years of the filing of plaintiffs’ complaint with the court. For some plaintiffs various statute of limitations issues relating to older claims remain outstanding. If necessary, a second refund will be made for older HMT claims related to exports. In addition, the court has determined that interest is owing on refunded amounts, but the United States is entitled to a stay pending appeal of this issue. Accordingly, if interest is finally determined to be owing, the second refund will include payment for whatever interest is owing.

Following submission of a claim form by a plaintiff the United States Customs Service will perform an initial search of its computer database for Harbor Maintenance Tax exporter payments. Plaintiff will review Customs’ information and, if the information is not disputed, will receive refunds for the specified amounts. Any plaintiff who wishes to dispute Customs’ information will have an opportunity to do so by submitting appropriate documentation to Customs. Claims that cannot be resolved after the plaintiffs submit their documentation will be submitted to the court for resolution. Thus, the claims disposition process will proceed as follows:

A. Receipt of Claims Forms

Each plaintiff will complete a claims form (see attached) and return it to Customs (address to be provided) by October 15,1998. Plaintiff will attach the filed complaint to its claim form. Customs will process refunds in chronological order by date of filing of plaintiffs first complaint.

B. Phase One — Initial Review of all Claims
1. Customs’ Verification

During Phase One of the claims process, Customs will inform plaintiffs of the quarterly payments verified in its database. To accomplish that, computer technicians will perform queries of Customs’ database for each exporter listed on the claims form. Customs will not search its back-up documentation during this phase. Customs will complete its report, listing all of the payments verified by the database and return [739]*739the HMT Payment Report and Certification (“Certification”) form to plaintiff. (See attached.).1

2. Plaintiffs’ Review

If it is satisfied with the payments listed on Customs’ report, a plaintiff will certify on the same form that it believes it is entitled to a refund in the amount specified. Plaintiff will then fill out and sign a judgment form (see attached) with the Certification attached and return the form to the Department of Justice for signing and filing with the court.

3. Schedule and Entry of Judgment

Defendant shall process no fewer than 500 claims per month and will report to the court monthly on its progress. The court expects speed of processing will increase over time. The first set of judgments shall be presented to the court by December 15, 1998. Each 15th day of the month thereafter another set of completed judgment forms shall be presented to the court.

C. Phase Two — Disputed Claims

Plaintiffs who wish to dispute the payments verified by Customs’ database will do so during Phase Two, which will begin immediately upon completion of Phase One, but no later than March 15,1999. Those plaintiffs will supply Customs with documentation supporting their claims for different or additional payments. Customs will query its computer database and perform the additional step of searching its paper records to attempt to resolve the dispute. Customs will then return a revised Harbor Maintenance Tax Payment Report and Certification form to plaintiffs. Administrative review will resolve many disputes; if the revised Certification is satisfactory to plaintiffs, they will then return a judgment with attached Certification form to the Department of Justice for a signature and filing.

D. Phase Three — Judicial Review

If the disputes cannot be resolved, plaintiffs may request judicial resolution by filing a proposed scheduling order with the court. Procedures established by this plan are not intended to apply to cases requiringjudi-cial resolution and whatever substantive or procedural law is normally applicable will apply.

II. Resolution of Other Issues

Stone Container Corp. v. United States, Court No. 96-10-02366 and Swisher Int’l., Inc. v United States, Court No. 95-03-00322 have been designated test cases on issues relating to jurisdiction and statute of [740]*740limitations. Any plaintiff who wishes immediate payment on claims covered by a complaint filed within the two years statute of limitations but has included older claims in its complaint must seek severance of the older claims. A proposed order of severance should be filed with the court; a new court number will be assigned and the severed action will be stayed pending resolution of the applicable test case.

Any HMT claim related to any non-export matter must also be severed if immediate judgment is desired on export claims. If there remain any non-export issues for which a test case is not now proceeding, a plaintiff who wishes its case to proceed as a test case on such issue shall so advise the court in its comments on the proposed plan by August 14,1998.

Court No._

Harbor Maintenance Tax Refund Claim Form

Date of Filing of First Complaint:_/_/_

Month Day Year

Instruction: Please supply all of the information requested below. If payment was made under more than one name or exporter identification number, please identify all possible names and EINs. Attach additional sheets if necessary. This form is to be used only by exporters who have filed complaints in the Court of International Trade. Any forms submitted by exporters who do not have a case pending will not be processed.

1. Name of Plaintiff(s):
2. Exporter Identification Number(s):
3. Exporter Address(es):

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Shoe Corp. v. United States, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 737 (cit 1998).

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 737 (United States Shoe Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. United States Shoe Corp.
523 U.S. 360 (Supreme Court, 1998)