United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox

Second Circuit

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox

297 F. 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2949

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1924

DocketNo. 275

StatusPublished

This text of 297 F. 1023 (United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox, 297 F. 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2949 (2d Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein was affirmed, with costs, in open court. This memorandum is to explain of record our affirmance. The action, one for personal injuries, haying been tried at law in the District Court, a writ of error issued and a bill of exceptions, so-called, was filed. Under compelling authority, and in response to due motion, we struck out the bill of exceptions as haying been illegally signed and filed. This left nothing before us but the judgment roll. On that judgment roll plaintiff-in-error offered to argue the proposition that the court below had no jurisdiction. We express no opinion as to whether the point as explained in counsel’s opening possesses merit or not; hut we find nothing in the judgment roll presenting the proposition to us. Examining the roll alone and nothing else, we find the proceedings regular; hence affirmance as ahoye noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein was affirmed, with costs, in open court. This memorandum is to explain of record our affirmance. The action, one for personal injuries, haying been tried at law in the District Court, a writ of error issued and a bill of exceptions, so-called, was filed. Under compelling authority, and in response to due motion, we struck out the bill of exceptions as haying been illegally signed and filed. This left nothing before us but the judgment roll. On that judgment roll plaintiff-in-error offered to argue the proposition that the court below had no jurisdiction. We express no opinion as to whether the point as explained in counsel’s opening possesses merit or not; hut we find nothing in the judgment roll presenting the proposition to us. Examining the roll alone and nothing else, we find the proceedings regular; hence affirmance as ahoye noted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 F. 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-shipping-board-emergency-fleet-corp-v-nox-ca2-1924.