United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox

297 F. 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2949
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 11, 1924·No. No. 275·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein was affirmed, with costs, in open court. This memorandum is to explain of record our affirmance. The action, one for personal injuries, haying been tried at law in the District Court, a writ of error issued and a bill of exceptions, so-called, was filed. Under compelling authority, and in response to due motion, we struck out the bill of exceptions as haying been illegally signed and filed. This left nothing before us but the judgment roll. On that judgment roll plaintiff-in-error offered to argue the proposition that the court below had no jurisdiction. We express no opinion as to whether the point as explained in counsel’s opening possesses merit or not; hut we find nothing in the judgment roll presenting the proposition to us. Examining the roll alone and nothing else, we find the proceedings regular; hence affirmance as ahoye noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox, 297 F. 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2949 (2d Cir. 1924).

297 F. 1023 (United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Nox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.