United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eliseo Jojo Prisno and P/E Capital Investment Management Partners

N.D. Illinois

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eliseo Jojo Prisno and P/E Capital Investment Management Partners

DecidedMarch 25, 2026

Docket1:25-cv-07491

StatusUnknown

This text of United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eliseo Jojo Prisno and P/E Capital Investment Management Partners (United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eliseo Jojo Prisno and P/E Capital Investment Management Partners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eliseo Jojo Prisno and P/E Capital Investment Management Partners, (N.D. Ill. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND : EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-7491 : ELISEO JOJO PRISNO and P/E : Hon. Jorge L. Alonso CAPITAL INVESTMENT : MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, : : Defendants. : :

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT P/E CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PARTNERS Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission, with the consent of defendant P/E Capital Investment Management Partners (“P/E Capital”), moves for the entry of a consent judgment. The SEC has submitted the proposed judgment to the Court by email, and has also attached it as Exhibit 1 hereto. The SEC has also attached P/E Capital’s consent, in which it agrees to the terms of the proposed judgment, as Exhibit 2 to this motion. The SEC further states: 1. The proposed judgment eliminates the need to litigate the merits of the claims asserted against P/E Capital. It also permanently enjoins it from the misconduct alleged in the SEC’s complaint. 2. The proposed judgment further provides that the monetary relief sought by the SEC against P/E Capital shall be resolved by the Court at a later date, by way of an

SEC motion. 3. This type of partial settlement, a regular form of resolution in SEC enforcement actions, is often referred to as a “bifurcated” settlement. See, e.g., SEC v. Williky, 942 F.3d 389 (7th Cir. 2019); SEC v. Zenergy Int’l, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127630 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 20, 2016). WHEREFORE, plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission

respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion, enter the proposed judgment attached as Exhibit 1 hereto, and grant such additional relief as the Court deems just and appropriate. Dated: March 25, 2026 Respectfully submitted,

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

/s/ Jonathan S. Polish Jonathan Polish, IL Bar No. 6237890 Alyssa Qualls IL Bar No. 6292124 Daniel Griffin, IL Bar No. 6289624 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1450 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353-7390 (312) 353-7398 (FAX) QuallsA@sec.gov PolishJ@sec.gov GriffinD@sec.gov LewisB@sec.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND : EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-7491 : ELISEO JOJO PRISNO and P/E : Hon. Jorge L. Alonso CAPITAL INVESTMENT : MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, : : Defendants. : :

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT P/E CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PARTNERS Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission, with the consent of defendant P/E Capital Investment Management Partners (“P/E Capital”), moves for the entry of a consent judgment. The SEC has submitted the proposed judgment to the Court by email, and has also attached it as Exhibit 1 hereto. The SEC has also attached P/E Capital’s consent, in which it agrees to the terms of the proposed judgment, as Exhibit 2 to this motion. The SEC further states: 1. The proposed judgment eliminates the need to litigate the merits of the claims asserted against P/E Capital. It also permanently enjoins it from the misconduct alleged in the SEC’s complaint. 2. The proposed judgment further provides that the monetary relief sought by the SEC against P/E Capital shall be resolved by the Court at a later date, by way of an

SEC motion. 3. This type of partial settlement, a regular form of resolution in SEC enforcement actions, is often referred to as a “bifurcated” settlement. See, e.g., SEC v. Williky, 942 F.3d 389 (7th Cir. 2019); SEC v. Zenergy Int’l, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127630 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 20, 2016). WHEREFORE, plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission

respectfully requests that the Court grant its motion, enter the proposed judgment attached as Exhibit 1 hereto, and grant such additional relief as the Court deems just and appropriate. Dated: March 25, 2026 Respectfully submitted,

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

/s/ Jonathan S. Polish Jonathan Polish, IL Bar No. 6237890 Alyssa Qualls IL Bar No. 6292124 Daniel Griffin, IL Bar No. 6289624 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1450 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353-7390 (312) 353-7398 (FAX) QuallsA@sec.gov PolishJ@sec.gov GriffinD@sec.gov LewisB@sec.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eliseo Jojo Prisno and P/E Capital Investment Management Partners, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-securities-and-exchange-commission-v-eliseo-jojo-prisno-and-ilnd-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack