United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Sullivan

80 F. 762, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky
DecidedSeptember 12, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 F. 762 (United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Sullivan, 80 F. 762, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070 (circtdky 1896).

Opinion

BARR, District Judge.

This case comes to me upon a demurrer to the bill, and the ground of the demurrer is that the amount in -controversy does not exceed $2,000, exclusive of interest and costs, [763]*763l;o as to give this court jurisdiction. The hill is for the foreclosure l)f a mortgage for a note dated March 28, 1890, for the sum of §2,000, Blearing interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum, interest paylible monthly. The following is a part of the note:

I “It is understood that this note is given for a loan obtained on 40 shares of ■stock of said United States Savings Loan & Building Company, and, if the maker ■lereof fails to make any monthly payment on said stock, or to pay any install■ment of interest for a period of three months after the same is due, then the ■whole amount of this note shall become due and payable. But if the maker hereof ■shall pay all installments of interest which become due hereon, and all monthly ■payments and fines which become due on said stock until said monthly payments ■shall have been past due for a period of six months, then, upon the surrender of ■said stock to said company, this note shall be deemed to be fully paid and eanIceled. This note is understood to be made with reference to and under the law's ■of the state of Minnesota.”

I The mortgage is executed upon real estate in Kentucky, in wbicb lit is provided that:

| “If the said party of the first part [the mortgagor], his heirs, executors, adminisItrators, or assigns, shall well and truly pay or cause to be paid to the said party of I the second part, its successors or assigns, at the office of the treasurer at St. Paul, I Minnesota, or at the office of its trustee, Minneapolis, Minnesota, $2,000 and inIterest, according to the conditions of one promissory note executed by Charles IB. Sullivan [the mortgagor], said party of the first part, to said party of the second I part, bearing even date herewith, payable after three years from date and before I nine years from date, wdth interest on $2,000 before and after maturity at the I rate of six per cent, per annum until paid, interest payable monthly, or shall pay I or cause to be paid to the treasurer of said company all installments of interest I which become due on said note, and all fines and monthly payments w'hich become I due on said stock until said stock becomes fully paid in, and of the value of $100 per share, and before any of said installments of interest or monthly payments shall have been past due for a period of six months, and shall then surrender said stock to said company in payment of said note, then this deed shall be null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. But, if default be made in the payment of said sum or sums of money, or of any installment of interest thereon, or of any monthly payment on said stock for a period of three months after the same shall be due, or any part of either, or in effecting the insurance or in paying the taxes or assessments at the time or times hereinbefore specified for the payment thereof, or in any condition in this mortgage contained, then, and in either or any such case, the whole principal sum or sums secured by this mortgage, and the interest thereon accrued up to the time of such default, shall, at the elect tion of said second party, its successors or assigns, or its or their agent, become thereupon due and payable immediately upon said default; and the said party of the first part doth hereby authorize and empower the said party of the second part, its successors or assigns, the owner hereof, its agent and attorney, at its or their election, and without notice of such election, to foreclose at once this mortgage for the whole of said principal sum or sums and accrued interest and money paid for taxes, assessments, and insurance, as herein provided, or to foreclose for such sum or sums and interest and money paid as may be due and payable by the terms of said note hereby secured; and to sell the hereby said premises at public .auction, and convey the same to the purchaser in fee simple, agreeably to the statutes in such case made and provided; and out of the money arising from such sale to retain the principal and interest and fines then accrued on the sum or sums so elected to be foreclosed for, together with any insurance, assessments, or taxes paid as above stipulated, and all costs and charges of such foreclosure, including seventy-five dollars ($75) attorney’s fees for foreclosing this mortgage, and pay the ■overplus, if any, to the said party of the first part, his heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns.”

There are two certificates, each, for 20 shares of stock. Certificate Ko. 22,121 is assigned absolutely to the complainant as a pre[764]*764mium for the loan granted to the defendant, and certificate No 4,382 for 20 shares is assigned as collateral security for said loan There is a provision in each of the certificates that the shareholdei agrees to pay 60 cents monthly on each share until said share matures or is withdrawn, and this monthly installment is due and must be paid on the second Tuesday of each month. Fifty-three cents of each monthly payment on each share and all fines shall be paid by the treasurer to the trustee on account of the loan fund, and the -.other seven cents of each installment shall go to the expenses. There is also a provision that there should be a fine of 10 cents due and payable on each share, if not paid when due, and a fine of 15 cents on each share for each subsequent monthly default.

The bill alleges that tire contract between the parties was intended to be and is governed by the laws of Minnesota, and that by the Minnesota law any premium for a loan is not to be considered asusury, nor to be counted as interest. It appears from the allegations of the bill and the exhibits that the complainant has agreed to pay more than $75 for this foreclosure of the mortgage, and he claims a lien therefor. It also appears that by a resolution of complainant’s board, not dated, but alleged to have been on the - day of April, 1895, this debt was declared matured, defaulted interest as alleged being then payable for a period of 28 months; and directed the principal of said note and mortgage which was in default to be foreclosed, and that the' stock which had been assigned to the company as collateral for the repayment of said loan be canceled, as provided in the by-laws of said company, and credit be given of such amount as would appear to be the withdrawal value of such stock after cancellation of same.

The accounts filed for the payment of interest on said note show that the monthly installments were paid, with the exception of one of the months, up to April, 1893, the last payment being $60, made December 3, 1892. It also shows that there was paid on certificate of stock No. 4,382, $492.34, the last payment being made December 3, 1892, and the amount $84.34; and on certificate No. 22,121 the installments paid amounted to $456, the last payment being on the 3d of December, 1892, for $72. The total is rendered thus:

Amount of loan.... $2,000 00'
Ctf. 4,382, stock ... 323 66
“ “ fines ... 80 00
“ 22,121, premium 336 00'
. “ “ fines . .. 83 00
“ “ interest 280 00'
$3,102 66-
Less book value Ctf. 4,382, 20 sbrs................................ 979 60
$2,123 06'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Posner v. Insurance Co. of North America
300 F. 383 (S.D. New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F. 762, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-savings-loan-building-co-v-sullivan-circtdky-1896.