United States Railway Administration v. Slatinka
260 U.S. 747, 43 S. Ct. 247, 67 L. Ed. 494, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 3252
Opinion
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa denied because tbé case abates for failure to substitute successor of petitioner [748]*748within oñe year after petitioner vacated office.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Railway Administration v. Slatinka, 260 U.S. 747, 43 S. Ct. 247, 67 L. Ed. 494, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 3252 (1923).
260 U.S. 747 (United States Railway Administration v. Slatinka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mellon v. Purse Bros.
138 S.E. 647 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1927)
Weiss v. Director General of Railroads
144 N.E. 765 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Vassau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
221 P. 1069 (Montana Supreme Court, 1923)
Jackson v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.
193 N.W. 128 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)