United States of America v. State of Washington

704 F.2d 1141, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28506
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States of America v. State of Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 694 F.2d 1374
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 27, 1983·No. 81-3111·Published

Opinion

704 F.2d 1141

UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 81-3111.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 27, 1983.

Edward B. Mackie, Deputy Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., for defendants-appellants.

William A. White, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Alan C. Stay, Seattle, Wash., for amicus curiae Hoh/Quileute/Nugually Tribe.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER FOR PUBLICATION

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals 694 F.2d 1374, for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America v. State of Washington, 704 F.2d 1141, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28506 (9th Cir. 1983).

704 F.2d 1141 (United States of America v. State of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States of America v. State of Washington
694 F.2d 1374 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)