United States of America v. Roscoe Ratliff, Jr.
This text of 59 F.3d 171 (United States of America v. Roscoe Ratliff, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 171
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Roscoe RATLIFF, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.
No. 95-5006.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 20, 1995.
Before: KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; DUGGAN, District Judge.*
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable Patrick J. Duggan, District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 171, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23444, 1995 WL 369440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-v-roscoe-ratliff-jr-ca6-1995.